Monday, January 19, 2009

Birthday of a Great American


For more than a century, Southerners in particular have celebrated the Birthday of Robert E. Lee as a holiday - in many Southern states as an official observance. In Virginia (the home state of General Lee and his compatriot General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson - whose birthday is January 21), the official state holiday for many years was "Lee-Jackson Day).

For a century, it has been the custom in many Southern states and communities to fly the battle flag of Lee's Army of Northern Virginia in tribute to Lee on January 19 in honor of his birthday. Some folks from the North are shocked, even scandalized, to learn that many Southern states give state employees the day off for Confederate Memorial Day - which few realize actually predated the Federal version of Memorial Day (which later was added to the list of holidays in the Southern states as well).

Robert Edward Lee was always a man of extraordinary character and talent.

He was born January 19, 1807, the son of Revolutionary War hero and Governor of Virginia, Gen. Henry "Lighthorse Harry" Lee. The Lees are among the oldest and most venerable families in Virginia. Robert's father died while Robert was eleven, leaving the family in disarray - and Robert grew up in Arlington, Virginia, raised by his devout Episcopalian mother.

He went to the USMA at West Point (class of 1829), and was one of the very few cadets to graduate with no demerits on his record. He finished second in his class. He served in the Corps of Engineers, and worked on Mississippi River levees (New Orleans has a prominent traffic circle near the river downtown named for Lee that features a towering column with a statue of General Lee atop). He later distinguished himself as an officer in the Mexican War (1847-49).

One of his last duties as a U.S. Army officer involved the "war on terror" of his day. Colonel Lee was put in charge of a detachment of U.S. Marines to arrest a terrorist named John Brown, a fanatic and mass-murderer, who, along with a small militia of extremists, had overtaken an army arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia in an attempt to seize arms for a planned slave uprising. Brown was captured, and later executed for treason. Today's history books largely (and shamefully) overlook his murderous spree of violence and even justify his terrorism based on his abolitionism.

Following the secession crisis of 1860-61, as seven states of the deep South had seceded (which did not include Lee's native Virginia), Northern President Abraham Lincoln offered Col. Lee command of all military forces of the United States. This was only three weeks after Lee had been promoted to full colonel - a remarkable offer. Though he opposed secession, Lee understood that his own state was poised to secede from the United States should the North invade the seceded states. True to his principle of honor over careerism, and in patriotism for his beloved Virginia, Lee declined the promotion. Virginia did later secede in indignation toward the refusal of the Lincoln administration to allow the seceded states to leave the Union in peace. Lee resigned his Federal commission to take command of the military forces of the newly-independent Commonwealth of Virginia.

After Virginia joined the other ten seceded states (as well as two other disputed provisional state governments and several U.S. territories that had likewise seceded) in forming the Confederate States of America, General Lee would find himself commanding one of the three major armies of the CSA: the Army of Northern Virginia (ANV).

Lee's ANV would rack up a remarkable record of victories, being noted not only for their military prowess, but courage, audacity, discipline, strategic and tactical brilliance, and innovation. As the ANV's commander, Lee insisted that his soldiers act with gentlemanly military bearing and chivalry toward civilians - whether Northern or Southern. Lee's reputation, both as a general and as a man of honor, was unquestioned - even by his opponents.

Lee wrote many letters to his family, and was deeply committed to his Christianity, to chivalric honor, to patriotism, to duty, and to ethical rigor.

As a general, Lee was concerned for the welfare of the common soldier. While on the march, he typically slept in a tent rather than in a house. The affection with which Lee was held by both grateful civilians and fighting men alike is shown by the anecdote (I believe recounted in Michael Shaara's Killer Angels) of how Lee was sleeping in his tent as a large detachment of Confederate soldiers tiptoed by as silently as possible so as not to disturb the general. Anyone who has participated in reenactments - being laden down with a clanging tin canteen, heavy musket, foot-long bayonet, bags of supplies, ammunition, and shod in noisy metal-heeled brogan shoes - realizes how comical and touching this scene must have been.

Lee and his indefatigable warriors beat the overwhelming odds for four long years. My own Confederate ancestors fought in Lee's Army of Northern Virginia and participated in some of American history's greatest battles. But in the end, the Confederates were defeated by sheer numbers in a war of attrition. In April of 1865, Lee surrendered his forces and laid down his arms. He was determined to partake in whatever misery lay ahead for his fellow Virginians. The now penniless General Lee, whose Arlington home was confiscated by vindictive federal bureaucrats, was a "man without a country." He was offered several lucrative contracts to do nothing more than allow his name (and thus his reputation) to be listed on corporate boards of directors - which General Lee felt would be dishonest. He turned down all such offers.

Instead, General Lee accepted the presidency of Washington College, believing education to be the best path to rebuilding the infrastructure of the demolished South. He insisted that every Washington College student be first and foremost a gentleman. After the war, General Lee showed respect and compassion to the veterans who were mostly common soldiers on both sides. He continued to exhort his fellow Southerners to patiently endure the insults, brutality, and outright political plunder of their post-war Northern countrymen, and get on with rebuilding their families and society.

General Lee died October 12, 1870, and was buried in a tomb beneath the chapel of Washington College (today known as the Lee Chapel of Washington and Lee University).

Wikipedia's article on General Lee, which in places is quite deliberately insulting, includes the following quote from the great Georgia Senator and orator Benjamin Harvey Hill delivered four years after the General's death, an opinion shared by Americans in the North and South alike:
He was a foe without hate; a friend without treachery; a soldier without cruelty; a victor without oppression, and a victim without murmuring. He was a public officer without vices; a private citizen without wrong; a neighbour without reproach; a Christian without hypocrisy, and a man without guile. He was a Caesar, without his ambition; Frederick, without his tyranny; Napoleon, without his selfishness, and Washington, without his reward.
In a day and age when "role models" are selected based solely on things like athletic ability, being in a rock band, having wealth, or artificially and arbitrarily based on race, sex, or perceived "gender identity"; even as character and nobility are overlooked, as trashiness is exalted, as scandal and sometimes criminality are no longer barriers for making a person worthy of emulation by young people - continuing to remember and honor Robert E. Lee on this, his birthday, is a refreshing act of rebellion against the forces of political correctness.

Robert Edward Lee was a man who stood for principles. He was a Christian, a patriot, a warrior, an educator, a peacemaker, and a man whose life was quietly ruled by the ever-present desire to do what is right. It is fitting that Americans, especially Southerners and most especially Virginians, remember this heroic man on this auspicious holiday commemorating his birth. And though fewer and fewer recall his ideals and example as the years go by, those who do continue to be edified by true greatness as opposed to manufactured mythmaking and the politically-correct collective overlooking of "inconvenient truths" that cannot be wished or ignored away.

Here is a tribute to General Lee written by Fr. Abram J. Ryan, the Roman Catholic priest who served as a Confederate chaplain and as a prolific and beloved American poet:

The Sword of Robert Lee

Forth from its scabbard, pure and bright,
Flashed the sword of Lee!
Far in the front of the deadly fight,
High o'er the brave in the cause of Right,
Its stainless sheen, like a beacon light,
Led us to Victory!

Out of its scabbard, where, full long,
It slumbered peacefully,
Roused from its rest by the battle's song,
Shielding the feeble, smiting the strong,
Guarding the right, avenging the wrong,
Gleamed the sword of Lee!

Forth from its scabbard, high in air
Beneath Virginia's sky --
And they who saw it gleaming there,
And knew who bore it, knelt to swear
That where that sword led they would dare
To follow -- and to die!

Out of its scabbard! Never hand
Waved sword from stain as free,
Nor purer sword led braver band,
Nor braver bled for a brighter land,
Nor brighter land had a cause so grand,
Nor cause a chief like Lee!

Forth from its scabbard! How we prayed
That sword might victor be;
And when our triumph was delayed,
And many a heart grew sore afraid,
We still hoped on while gleamed the blade
Of noble Robert Lee!

Forth from its scabbard all in vain
Bright flashed the sword of Lee;
'Tis shrouded now in its sheath again,
It sleeps the sleep of our noble slain,
Defeated, yet without a stain,
Proudly and peacefully!

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Sermon: Epiphany 2


18 January 2009 at Salem Lutheran Church, Gretna, LA

Text: John 2:1-11 (Amos 9:11-15, Eph 5:22-33)

In the name of + Jesus. Amen.

This miracle, turning water into wone at a wedding feast, is, according to St. John, “the first of His signs, Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested His glory, and His disciples believed in Him.”

This first of many miracles got the disciples’ attention, it was a manifestation of the Lord’s glory, of His divine nature. It worked faith in the disciples, and this in turn brought about an even greater, though unseen miracle: the miracle of the mystery of faith itself.

And it is fitting that this, the first manifestation of His glory, was done at a wedding, the celebration of the mystery of the oldest institution known to man, the order through which God continues to create humanity, bringing new people into the world.

It is also fitting that this first sign was done at a feast, a celebration of great joy in the context of a meal. For indeed, it is impossible to have a feast without eating, to celebrate without bread on the table, without hospitality, and without table fellowship.

And again, it is fitting that this first miraculous manifestation of the Lord’s power was an event marked with not only wine, but with the “good wine,” wine made miraculously by the Word and command of Jesus. Wine is also part of feasting, of celebration, of joy. The Lord spoke through the prophet Amos, promising that in the final paradise, “the mountains shall drip sweet wine” and that the Lord’s people “shall plant vineyards and drink their wine.” In many of our Lord’s parables, eternity is pictured as a marriage feast in which wine is enjoyed by all the guests.

And yet, in this fallen world, marriages, feasts, and the drinking of wine are far from ideal.

What was created by God to be a wondrous bond between a man and a woman for life, designed to create a nurturing home for children, has fallen into selfish short-term partnering arrangements that are anything but a place of refuge for little ones. In the culture of death, we see abortion, abuse, and neglect of children. We see selfish parents going back on their vows. We see marriage even being redefined to run contrary to nature. The picture has become so murky that one is hard-pressed to see this as St. Paul did, “This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the Church.” The biblical notion of a man lovingly serving as the head of his family, and his wife lovingly submitting to his headship has largely become a forgotten relic – and we can see the results all around us.

Feasts have likewise changed from being celebrations of thanksgiving to our gracious God who provides all things, into being hedonistic displays of gluttony and consumerism in which God may never be mentioned except for as a curse word. Wedding receptions, in particular, have become crass and vulgar affairs wrapped up in self-obsession and wasteful spending that, far from calling to mind the mystery of men and women binding themselves together in love, instead become spectacles of gaudiness and trashiness unbefitting the dignity of a Christian sacramental act.

Even wine, one of the oldest and most joyous gifts from the Lord to man, has been perverted and ruined by our sinful nature. Instead of serving man in pleasure, alcohol is often abused and turns man into a slave, sometimes violent, and even to the point of the alcohol becoming a false god. What a terrible distortion of the glorious promise of a paradise in which wine drips from the very mountains, its sweetness to be enjoyed.

Sin has taken all of these good gifts and corrupted them, turned joy into despair, turned grace into a curse, and distorted the manifestation of our Lord’s glory at a wedding feast as He turned water into wine.

And yet, the fact that sin has corrupted this sign makes this sign all the more meaningful. For our Lord uses this miracle not only to prove a point, not only to “manifest His glory,” but also to give His blessing to marriages, to feasts, and to wine. He has come to reclaim what man, at his basest and vilest, has perverted and made nearly unrecognizable as gifts of a gracious God.

“You have kept the good wine until now,” says the master of the feast. The best of the Lord’s creation is yet to come. This “first of His signs” is but a preview, a small glimpse into His re-created Eden, His new creation, His eternity that He has prepared for us, His redeemed.

For no matter how unfaithful husbands and wives are to one another in this fallen world, Jesus is the perfect Bridegroom to His Church. Jesus indeed shows men how to love their wives, as marriage as it was created and as it was intended to be is the very picture of Jesus’s love for the Church. Marriage is redeemed by the Redeemer, and the bride and bridegroom become one flesh, even as our Lord’s flesh is mingled with our flesh in the mystery of Holy Communion. For in mutual love in which each spouse loves the other above himself, we see the picture of the Lord Jesus Christ and the perfect love that will be between Him and the Church when heaven and earth are made anew.

No matter how far we have taken our eyes off of Jesus as we seek to find fulfillment in material things, our Lord Jesus continues to feed us with the foretaste of the greatest feast of all – the Eternal Wedding Feast of the Lamb and His Bride. The Feast is redeemed by the Redeemer, and the eternal celebrations are unmarked by gluttony and selfishness, by garishness and false gods. For this Feast is not about us, but all about our Lord and His triumph over sin, death, and the devil.

No matter how much we abuse the good gift of wine, our Lord chooses to make His first sign a miraculous provision of the fruit of the vine. Wine is redeemed by the Redeemer, and the wine in this eternal banquet is not abused, not used as an excuse for shameful behavior, and is not there for the purpose of seeking to dull the senses or fulfill an addiction. For this is the Savior who gives His blood to us in the form of wine, the cup of the New Testament, shed for us for the forgiveness of sins.

Dear brothers and sisters, our Lord Jesus manifests His glory in the very midst of all the worldly things that we sinners abuse. This is not by accident. For our Lord’s mission is one of re-creation, reclamation, and restoration.

For we are to marry, and feast, and drink. We are to become one flesh as men and women, to multiply, to live in traditional families, and see marriage as sacred and holy. We are to feast, to enjoy the fruits of the earth, to celebrate with all the faithful the marriage feast of the Lamb, to eat the daily bread provided for us by our Creator. And we are to drink wine for sheer joy, celebrating the good gifts of creation and partaking in the blood of Christ that was shed for us men and for our salvation.

And though this was the first sign, it was not to be the last. For the Lord Jesus Christ became one flesh with His Church as He shared His body and blood at the Last Supper. The Lord Jesus gave His Bride the eternal feast of the New and Greater Passover Lamb, whose sacrifice is partaken of by all the redeemed. The Lord Jesus has promised to drink wine with us anew in His kingdom, even as He poured out His blood on the cross and gives us the wine of Hid blood in the Holy Sacrament.

The Lord Jesus withholds nothing from His Bride, the Church. The feast we partake in is eternal, for indeed, He has “kept the good wine until now.” Amen.

In the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Friday, January 16, 2009

Let Us Scribble!


My colleague in the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod and brother in the Office of the Holy Ministry, Rev. Christopher D. Hall , has given me a high honor - the Superior Scribbler Award. I think it must have something for my lifelong inability to "stay inside the lines."

In accordance with the rubrics and stipulations of this ancient order of blogospheric knighthood, below is a list of the rules and rubrics governing this distinction:
  • Each Superior Scribbler must in turn pass The Award on to 5 most-deserving Bloggy Friends.
  • Each Superior Scribbler must link to the author & the name of the blog from whom he/she has received The Award.
  • Each Superior Scribbler must display The Award on his/her blog, and link to This Post, which explains The Award.
  • Each Blogger who wins The Superior Scribbler Award must visit this post and add his/her name to the Mr. Linky List. That way, we'll be able to keep up-to-date on everyone who receives This Prestigious Honor!
  • Each Superior Scribbler must post these rules on his/her blog.
In accordance with my obligations as a Scribbler, I hereby nominate the following as fellow-Scribblers, granting them all the rights and privileges thereof (and of course, I commend them to you for your perusal, dear reader):

The Rev. Subdeacon Latif Gaba for Gaba's Notebook
The Rev. Paul Beisel for One Lutheran…Ablog!™
The Rev. James McDonald for Family Reformation
Mrs. Stacy McDonald for Your Sacred Calling
"Past Elder" for Past Elder

Now go and do likewise...

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Sermon: Baptism of Our Lord (trans)


14 January 2009 at Salem Lutheran Church, Gretna, LA

Text: Matt 3:13-17 (Isa 42:1-7, 1 Cor 1:26-31)


In the name of + Jesus. Amen.

Our Lord Jesus Christ is full of surprises.

He presents Himself to His cousin John in order to submit to a baptism of repentance, a washing away of sin by water and the Word. Obviously, this stuns John, for even as an infant in his mother’s womb, the Holy Spirit revealed to John who Jesus is. And John knows full well that this is the “Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”

“What are you doing here?” says John. He suggests that the proper thing would be to change places. But John is wrong. The proper thing is not always what reason and the senses say is proper. Rather the proper thing is what our Lord says: “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” To fulfill all righteousness…

Jesus is not submitting to a sinner’s baptism to admit, repent of, or be forgiven of sins. Rather He submits so that we sinners can admit, repent of, and be forgiven of our sins – which are washed away by water through the Word. And this Word is in the water itself.

Fifteen hundred years later, a fellow baptizer and preacher, whose head many wanted on a plate as well, would pen the question: “How can water do such great things?” The answer is: “Certainly not just water, but the Word of God in and with the water does these things.” The Word is not only the Bible. Nor does the Word mean only the baptismal formula spoken over the water – but is truly the Word, that is Christ Himself, “in and with” the water that makes disciples, forgives sins, saves, and gives us a washing of rebirth.

Baptism without the Word of God, that is, without Christ, is only water. But when the Word is implanted into the water, as we confess in the catechism: “it is a baptism, that is, a life-giving water, rich in grace, and a washing of the new birth in the Holy Spirit, as St. Paul says in Titus, chapter three.”

And this, dear friends, is made possible because the Word, that is, the Word made flesh, has sanctified the water of the Jordan, and indeed, as Luther’s famous flood-prayer confesses to God: “You sanctified and instituted all waters to be a blessed flood and a lavish washing away of sin.” The water in this font is as holy as the water of the Jordan – for our Lord has made it so.

Though our world is fallen, though creation reeks of sin, though much of the water on our planet is brackish or polluted – even as our sinful nature is corrupted – things are not to remain this way. Dear brothers and sisters, God broke into creation to redeem that creation, to re-create, and to make new!

“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” to redeem our flesh, and our dwellings. Jesus, the Word of God “by whom all things were made,” who “created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and what comes from it, who gives breath to the people on it and spirit to those who walk in it,” enters the water like the sinful world drowned by the flood, like “hard-hearted Pharaoh,” like a body descending into a tomb – and from this position of death, of sin, of tainted creation, He breaks to the surface, having consecrated all waters, all creation, and indeed all men in the name of the Godhead, the Omnipresent made present in our limited creation, the Omnipotent given to “what is weak in the world to shame the strong.”

Jesus had no reason to be cleansed by baptismal water, but baptismal water had need to be sanctified by Him!

Jesus, who is holy, nevertheless submits to being declared holy by the priests. Jesus, who is the God of the covenant, nevertheless submits to circumcision under the law. Jesus, who is sinless, nevertheless submits to a baptism of repentance under a prophet. Jesus, who is king, nevertheless submits to being declared a king by a lesser man, who posts the declaration above His cross. Jesus, who owes no wages of sin, nevertheless submits to death on the cross as a ransom for those who believe and as victory over death itself. Jesus, who is God, submits to manhood to save mankind.

This is what He means by: “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.”

And this was not to be the last surprise of the day, for as our Lord emerged from the water, “behold , the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming to rest on Him.”

Thus we see the Holy Spirit’s work – which is never apart from the Word of God, from the Son, from the sacramental means by which He is present among us, “the Lord and giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son.” If the Holy Spirit is given to our perfect Lord as He is washed with baptismal water, how much more are we, the redeemed, the ones who stand in the wake of our Lord, surrounded by the same “Lord and giver of life.”

And as if God the Son showing up in space and time, humbly waiting in line to be given a sinner’s baptism, and, the very Holy Spirit descending into space and time in the visible and humble form of a dove, are not enough of a surprise, imagine the “shock and awe” of hearing the voice of God the Father Almighty resounding as a voice from the heavens themselves, rending the air with a mighty Paternal proclamation: “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well-pleased.” In this Most Holy Baptism, we have the triple miracle of the three Persons of the Most Holy Trinity showing up in space and time, being completely accessible to the senses, all out of love for His creation and for the redemption of His creatures.

And yet, this is not where the surpeise and the miraculous wonder end. The baptism of our Lord Jesus begins His ministry, His sojourn of three years walking the earth before His death and resurrection. At the very end of that three year ministry, our Lord gives the great commission to the eleven disciples, the men who are being ordained as apostles, the men whom the Lord is placing into an office of authority to act on His behalf in preaching the Word, forgiving sins, and bringing people into communion with the Holy Trinity. And how does He tell them to do this?

“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them…” To be brought into the redemptive work of God, to be recreated, to be born again, to be cleansed from all sins, to be renewed and restored to new life is to be baptized. And the miracle of the Word, that is, the Son, being present in the water; the Holy Spirit’s descent; and the Father’s voice of Paternal acknowledgment, love, and delight are all present for us in this ongoing Holy Baptism applied to each one of us.

For the Trinity is still at work. The Persons of God continue in self-revelation for the surprising purpose of saving and making new. And this divine power is still at work in all of our miraculous baptisms, which as our Lord instructs, are indeed carried out, even as was His…

In the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

I'm reminded of a saying by...



...the Rev. Kenneth Korby:
"God ordains men to the pastoral office. Be one."
Enough said.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Taste Worship?



I recently got an invitation to a "worship event" at a local LCMS congregation in which the worship is to be "led" by a guy named Peder Eide. I don't believe he is an ordained minister. I asked him what his denominational affiliation is, and he wrote back that he is a Lutheran.

Sadly, "Lutheran" has become a word that lacks precision these days. Obviously, there are not only many synods, but many theologies covered by the term "Lutheran" even within our own synod.

According to his Taste Worship website, his next event (Jan 21, 2009) will be at Mount Calvary Lutheran Church in Excelsior, MN, a self-described "open and welcoming ELCA congregation" that has a woman "pastor" on staff.

His use of the term "taste worship" is interesting, if not ironic.

The word "taste" can mean different things. "Taste" can be used in a literal sense, as in physical eating - which is indeed central to worship in the Lutheran tradition - as in the Sacrament of the Altar, also known as the Mass or the Lord's Supper (e.g. AC X and AC XXIV). "Taste" also has a more figurative meaning, which conveys propriety and decorum - which is certainly also central to the Lutheran tradition of reverence in Lutheran worship - which is, in fact, clearly spelled out in our Lutheran confessions (e.g. the condemnation of "spectacles" and the requirement that worship embody "Christian discipline" and "evangelical decorum" per FC SD X:7 and the "greatest reverence" of liturgical worship, per AC XXIV:1).

Is either definition of "taste" being used here?

I would certainly describe the worship at my own congregation as tasteful. Not because of any aesthetic talents of our own. But rather only because we follow the reverential historic liturgy of the Western Mass as it has been handed over to us from our Evangelical Catholic (Lutheran) fathers. Our worship is also centered on the physical act of "taste," as every Divine Service is grounded in the miracle of the Holy Eucharist of the Lord's most holy body and blood.

And our worship services really do embody what Mr. Eide dreams about - diversity according to age. Our version "taste worship" routinely includes newborns right up to octogenarians (and occasionally, a nonagenarian) gathered in family groups from every race and socioeconomic status. That is the beauty of traditional worship - our hymns are not bound by time and style. They don't pit one group against the other. Nobody is left out just because they might not like rock music or fit in with the ever-transient youth culture.

I'm sure he means well, but if Mr. Eide truly wants to "taste worship" in New Orleans, featuring diverse trans-generationalism (even transcending the grave!), he might want to visit a traditional Lutheran church to "taste and see that the Lord is good" (Ps 34:8) through the Most Holy Sacrament, and join with young, old, living, dead, human beings, angels, and even the Lord Jesus Christ in the flesh Himself, in heavenly worship that leaves this fallen culture of death outside the doors of the Holy Ark of the Church, and likewise leaves the guitars, light-shows, and other entertainments to the real rock stars who perform at places like the House of Blues in the French Quarter, or in our many music festivals in New Orleans. If we want to rock, rap, or zydeco the day (and night) away, there are lots (and lots!) of times and places to do that - just not during the Divine Service in our church sanctuary.

Some things are sacred.

And just because I habitually wear all black, cut my musical teeth on hard rock and heavy metal, and one of my parishioners gave me the CD "Black Ice" as a Christmas present (thank you, Barbara, you rock!), doesn't mean I'll be strutting into the sanctuary any time soon to the strains of "Back in Black" or screaming lines from "Rock and Roll Damnation" to those on the "Highway to Hell." As an adult convert to Lutheranism I have to make an observation: you "cradle Lutherans" have a treasure that you too often take for granted, not only in the magnificent corpus of sacred music from 500 years of rigorous sung "theology of the cross" that is glorious, timeless and applicable to every generation, and the envy of all Christendom, but you also have the mother lode of the liturgy, the full richness of ancient words from the very Word of God that breathe life into dead bones and make them live! Please don't take these holy treasures for granted and trade them away for a pottage of mere entertainment.

And in spite of Mr. Eide's good intentions, there are always "unintended consequences" - such as the utterly unrealistic expectation among teenagers that worship (and indeed the Christian life itself) will always be fun, entertaining, pulsating, filled with adoring fist-pumping crowds, and an emotional "high." For when when his "theology of glory" rock and roll roadshow has moved on, and when those same young people find themselves back in the real world struggling with family problems, with temptation, with the culture of death, when they find themselves in hospitals, at deathbeds, and dealing with authentic life in the sin-weary flesh rather than a rock and roll fantasy - it will be us pastors who will minister, truly minister to them under the cross, with traditional hymns and liturgical worship, forged in the furnace of the centuries, which preach Christ crucified, breathe life into fallen flesh, and bequeath salvation and true comfort - not just a catchy tune or a slogan on a t-shirt.

And under the cross, God's people of every generation and demographic will truly "taste worship", drinking the sacred wine of the Lord's blood unto eternal salvation rather than simply slurping the artificial Kool-Aid of sugary pop entertainment.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Sermon: Epiphany 1


11 January 2009 at Salem Lutheran Church, Gretna, LA

Text: Luke 2:41-52 (1 Kings 8:6-13, Rom 12:1-5)


In the name of + Jesus. Amen.

It has suddenly become popular to be “spiritual” as opposed to “religious.” To be “spiritual” is cool, but to be “religious” is somehow old-fashioned and out of touch. And, as a bonus, being “spiritual” means having no organized religion, no place where one is expected to be, no obligation of other people, no need to live one’s life in conformity with the demands of organized religion. After all, God is everywhere, so I might as well let him deal with me where I want to be: the golf course, the fishing camp, or best of all, sleeping in on Sunday. In other words, being “spiritual” means doing whatever we want and being convinced that God is happy with the arrangement.

Of course, being “spiritual” in this way is a lot less rigorous than being “religious” and avoids the social stigma.

St. Paul speaks of “spiritual worship.” And yet his use of the word “spiritual” has nothing to do with having God meet us on our terms on the golf course or on the beach. In fact, “spiritual worship” means to “present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God.” It means: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind.” Notice how Paul doesn’t drive a wedge between the body and the spirit. The two are together. And to be spiritual means using the vehicle of your body to submit to God’s will. And notice how Paul carries this talk of the body to lead us right to the Church that is so despised by people who would rather be “spiritual.” St Paul observes: “as in one body we have many members, and the members do not all have the same function, so we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another.”

In other words, being “spiritual” means, at least according to God’s Word, to be physically attached and active in the Body of Christ, that is, the Church. And just as an arm doesn’t get to pick when and where the body will be, and what he, the arm, will be doing at any given time, neither does “being spiritual” in the true sense of the word mean shunning the “living sacrifice” of church life and pursuing a self-centered hobby instead.

False religions vilify the body and seek the body’s separation from the spirit. But if you think about it, this is death. But Christianity doesn’t seek to separate the two. In fact, “spiritual worship” is based on a transformation and renewal of the mind, and offering up our bodies in submission to our Lord through service to His Church! And that, dear friends, is the very opposite of death. Jesus describes the physical attachment of the Christian life in terms of His being the vine and we the branches. Plants survive by bodily organic connection – not by some kind of “spiritual” separation.

And it is true that God is a Spirit. He needs no house. He is truly everywhere. But notice that God wanted a house, a place where He could be located in space and time, where man could meet Him. The Ark of the Covenant was a place where God’s Spirit could dwell in the physical world, and where God’s flesh-and-blood people could assemble around His Word. The Lord assigned certain men to a priesthood to stand in the Holy Place and to minister before Him for the sake of the people.

The omnipresent God is indeed on the golf course. But God doesn’t invite us to the golf course to enter His presence, to receive His gifts, to eat and drink with Him in unending communion, to forgive our sins, or to strengthen our faith. For that is done physically, in the flesh, in the very same mode that God comes to us. And if God, who truly is spiritual, who has no need to be “religious,” but even He chooses to be present in space and time, in body and blood, in His Word proclaimed by His priests, in holy places at holy times – what makes anyone think they are somehow different?

Let us look to our Lord Jesus Christ Himself!

When the holy family went to Passover as our Lord was even still under the age of the traditional bar-mitzvah, the boy Jesus was in the temple, in His “Father’s House.” And though His Father had no need of a house, the Father knew beforehand that His Son, in human flesh, would be in that holy place at a holy time to be about His Father’s business.

And notice that not only does our Lord submit to His divine Father’s will, but also to His human mother’s: “And he went down with them and came to Nazareth and was submissive to them.”

This, dear brothers and sisters, is the ultimate in what it means to be “spiritual.” If anyone had reason, and indeed the right, to shun “organized religion,” it would be our Lord. Our Lord Jesus Christ always pointed out hypocrisy and false religiosity, and yet He never spurned the temple, never played “spirituality” against “religion,” and never attended to His own comfort instead of meeting the obligations given Him by the Father – including the cross itself. And it is He who taught us to pray “Thy will be done.”

Dear friends, we too have obligations. We parents are obliged to baptize our children, to instruct them in the faith, to bring them to their Father’s house, to establish our own homes as sanctuaries for the Word of God – which is our “spiritual worship.” Even those of us who are not parents have responsibilities as members of the Body of Christ. In human physiology, when part of the body rebels against the rest of the body, it is known as cancer, and such malignant cells do not seek merely to be independent, they seek to destroy their host. Those who claim to be Christians, but of a “spiritual” sort, bodily disconnected from the House of the Lord, from the Body of the Church, are likewise malignant – even if their only intention is to be selfish and lazy.

And lest we become self-righteous, let us all heed St. Paul’s admonition: “For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think,” for by virtue of the sin that dwells in each one of us, we all bear the malignancy of selfishness, of rebellion, of a lack of love for the Body of Christ and an inbred desire to push back against the divine Head of the Church, our Lord Himself. And the good news is that “He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world.”

Because of our sinful nature, we cling all the more tightly to the Body of Christ, seeking Him where He may be found, “in this holy house,” and bodily gathering with “all who offer here their worship and praise” – which is indeed “your spiritual worship.”

The old temple was finally destroyed, as the Lord tabernacled among us in the Word made flesh. The temple of His body was destroyed, but on the third day, that Most Holy Temple was rebuilt. And unlike the old temple of stone, this new and greater temple is one of flesh and blood. And that flesh and blood is not limited, as ours are, to only one place and one time. Indeed, the new and greater temple is the Lord’s body and blood, and He is housed in the tabernacles of Christian churches of every time and place, and give to us to eat and to drink, turning our bodies likewise into temples of the Holy Spirit.

Dear brothers and sisters, to be truly spiritual is to submit – even as our Lord did – not only to those placed over him by virtue of their parental vocation, but to submit to the will of our loving Father that we gather in spirit and in body around His Word, in His sanctuary, in the Most Holy Place where His flesh and blood are given to us. Being spiritual is also about being in the flesh. In God’s good creation, both the body and spirit of man are in the image of God. For our God is not only a spirit, but willingly took flesh and dwelt among us.

And just as a child instinctively gathers around the bottom of a Christmas tree or roots around inside a stocking to seek gifts, we, the body of Christ, know where the Lord’s gifts of forgiveness, life, and salvation are to be found. We, like our pre-teen Lord, know that we are called upon to be in our Father’s House, to submit to our Lord’s Will, and to see to it that being “spiritual” doesn’t mean deluding ourselves that where our bodies are makes no difference.

Indeed, dear friends, it is only “by the mercies of God” that the Lord empowers us to “present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” Amen.

In the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Friday, January 09, 2009

Only in the Big Easy...

...do the following three items go together: Mardi Gras, lingerie, and crawfish.

Carnival is officially here, and today, the Hollywoods joined a tour group of friends to visit Blaine Kern's Mardi Gras World. MGW is a local institution, as Kern (a.k.a. "Mr. Mardi Gras") makes the "greatest free show on earth" possible. Mr. Kern's studio is where local artists, beginning on the day after Mardi Gras (which for a lot of Lutherans could be called "Ashless Wednesday") and work like mad to get the floats created for next year's Carnival.

After a short film giving the historical background of Mardi Gras and of Blaine Kern's studio, we were all treated to king cake and coffee, after which we were given a tour of the warehouse/workship/museum as artists plied their trade.

We had a great time, and afterward wanted to get some lunch.

A block from our church, and two blocks from home is a little neighborhood pub called Bourré's. It always smells so good in the neighborhood when Bourré's is preparing barbecue. A couple weeks back, the three of us were bicycling by, and stopped to check out the place. I wanted to make sure Lion Boy was permitted inside (some restaurants are also bars, and they do have different rules for the under-21 crowd). When we stopped at that time, the place was basically empty, and the lady manager (owner?) told us that they serve lunch, have excellent burgers, and indeed Leo was welcome to come. They even have live music on Friday nights.

And so, after working up a Big Easy appetite touring Mardi Gras World, this seemed like a good time to pop in.

Again, the place was basically empty, save for a fellow at the end of the bar, a single occupied table with a couple folks in the middle of the small dining room, and the same lady manager. Our eyes were immediately drawn to the 12-foot alligator (real) mounted above the bar. The manager came out from behind the bar with an awkward look on her face (maybe it isn't every day a clergyman "in uniform" walks into the bar, at least without a rabbi...). As Leo and I looked at the gator, I heard Mrs. Hollywood, in her ever-unflappable, deadpan way, remark: "I seem to be a little overdressed here."

I turned to look just in time to see two ladies at the table in the middle of the dining room scurrying to cover up with long coats. The manager then sheepishly explained that on Tuesdays and Fridays they have "lingerie shows." I shrugged and smiled at the now-draped ladies at the table and offered: "Kinda chilly in here, huh?" Of course, it was 70 degrees and the doors were open...

Mrs. Hollywood was enjoying this way too much. What else could we do but laugh. We thought of it as just another comical thing that routinely happens in our alternate universe known as New Orleans. But it did seem like the women were genuinely embarrassed. The guy at the end of the bar was cracking up. Oblivious, Leo was petting the tail of the stuffed tiger (this is LSU country, after all) next to the cigarette machine (of which I didn't think any existed any more), and the manager did her best to smooth things over with me and actually try to talk us into staying. Her poise and salesmanship were something to behold.

We said we'd just go somewhere else for lunch. The manager did let us know the show would be over at 2:30 and that there would be live music tonight (presumably, the band would be clad in more than their underwear). Ever chipper, Mrs. Hollywood said good bye and thanked the lady manager. I said we'd be back another time. Leo happily called out "Bye" and waved.

How archetypically N'wahluns! The only things missing missing were the inexplicable guy carrying a chicken under his arm and the ubiquitous fella in the pirate costume. It was funny that there was no sign or anything to give us a heads up that there would be nearly nude women in the restaurant one block from our Christian elementary school at noontime during the week. But leave it to Mrs. H. to put it all into perspective: "Well, they weren't naked." And, as Mrs. H. pointed out, they did cover up when they saw the clerical collar. Mrs. H. has indeed acclimated herself to the local "laissez-faire" Crescent City culture - but then again, she's a French Canadian, cut of the same cloth, and has inherited her iron constitution and "Gallic shrug" from her equally unshockable grandmother.

So, we ambled off to our usual neighborhood haunt, Common Grounds - reasonably certain that only the sandwiches there might be "undressed."

And, as a bonus, one of the specials was crawfish pasta - which was a fitting way to end a great Big Easy day! Bons temps. Seulement ici.



Creative Billboard Advertising

Thursday, January 08, 2009

ESV Gains International Traction

The ESV Bible Blog has a post about the president of Ghana being sworn in on an ESV Bible.

There are things that irk me about the ESV, but it is a vast improvement over the NIV. I suppose we should keep in mind that every English Bible is only a translation, and no translation is going to be perfect. One thing going for the ESV is that an ESV with the Apocrypha is being released February 1, 2009. This provides Lutherans, Anglicans, and Roman Catholics with a conservative alternative to the hideously leftist NRSV.

It also bears saying that the ESV Study Bible is a tremendous scholarly work, arguably the best (and most economical) single-volume study Bible in the English language, even with its tilt toward Reformed and Neo-Evangelical theology in the study notes and many of the articles (some of its assertions about Lutheran theology are simply wrong). The maps and charts, as well as the included customizable online version, are head and shoulders above anything else on the market. It would have been better if the ESV Study Bible were more truly ecumenical - as its ancestral New Oxford Annotated (RSV) was. But for its aids and helps to understanding the literal reading of the text, the ESV Study Bible is a real treasure.

Hopefully, the upcoming Lutheran Study Bible from CPH (the LCMS's publishing house) will incorporate some of these outstanding features as well. Augsburg Fortress (the ELCA's publishing house) is also coming out with a Lutheran Study Bible this year. Hopefully, there won't be too much confusion!

We may indeed see the ESV overtake not only the NIV but also the NKJV as the preferred conservative modern English-language Bible translation.

The Latin Lover Podcast


"The Latin Lover" isn't a title one would associate with an American monk living in Rome - but "The Latin Lover" in this case is the Rev. Fr. Reginald "Reggie" Foster, the Vatican's foremost expert in the Latin language.

I stumbled upon Fr. Reggie's podcasts. You can subscribe and hear the good father hold forth on various topics related to ecclesiastical Latin and church history. If you think the words "Latin" and "lecture" and "boring" go together, you're dead wrong. Father Reggie is anything but dusty and musty (graduates of Concordia Theological Seminary - Fort Wayne will be reminded of our incomparable and beloved Dr. David Scaer - either with warm affection or with a chilling sense of dread - or both at the same time).

So if you'd like to be a Latin Lover, check out these podcasts. Father's Christmas special can be heard here. And here is a site dedicated to Fr. Reggie's Latin pedagogy.

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Sermon: Epiphany (transferred)


7 January 2009 at Salem Lutheran Church, Gretna, LA

Text: Matt 2:1-12 (Isa 60:1-6, Eph 3:1-12)


In the name of + Jesus. Amen.

There is something about royalty that we Americans distrust. There is something terribly unfair about allowing a man to govern just because of his parentage. And even though we Americans have our Kennedy and Bush families, we at least make them stand for election.

Kings, however, are not elected – at least not by the people.

In the church’s Gospel reading for the Day of Epiphany, we have several kings. There is the seated king of the Jews, Herod, a wicked king who was not particularly loved by his own people, a cruel man who exalted himself for the sake of power. There is also the new and eternal King of the Jews, our Lord Jesus Christ, a King who is not only godly, but is also God, who was likewise not loved by a goodly number of His own people, a perfect Man who humbled Himself out of love for the people He has come to rescue.

Then there are the magi, traditionally three kings from the orient, who were led to the one “born king of the Jews” by a star, and likely informed about the coming King by a copy of the Old Testament left behind in Persia by the ancestors of King Jesus hundreds of years earlier.

So who has been “born king of the Jews?” The question is why Herod is “troubled” – for Herod and his ruling dynasty were not truly legitimate. They clung to the power they seized by ruthlessness and by appeasing the pagan Romans. Herod and his family were destined to be knocked off the throne, and they seem to grasp the tenuous nature of their rule. King Herod fears King Jesus – for Jesus is truly the one “born king of the Jews” – which was to be written in words above His thorn-crowned head a little more than thirty years later by the Roman governor Pilate – a friend of a later Herodian king who would likewise seek the extermination of the true King of the Jews.

Unlike the jealous pretender-king and tyrant Herod, who would go as far as to murder babies in a desperate bid to rid the world of the one “born king of the Jews” according to the ancient prophecies, the magi humbled themselves before the baby King. The magi brought gifts demonstrating the fitness of Jesus for the throne – gold, frankincense, and myrrh. And what’s more, they did not call upon King Jesus as equal heads of state, as fellow monarchs, as peers within the royal system. Indeed, these kings “fell down and worshiped Him.” The nature, the divine nature, of King Jesus was revealed to the magi. And it may well have been revealed by the prophet Isaiah: “the wealth of the nations shall come to you… camels of Midian and Ephah; all those from Sheba shall come. They shall bring gold and frankincense, and shall bring good news, the praises of the Lord.”

The magi did not come to worship Herod. In fact, they only consulted Herod for information about the one “born king of the Jews.”

The Church has set aside this “twelfth night,” this day after the twelfth day of Christmas, to commemorate this “epiphany,” this manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ. For He has been shown to the entire world – even to Gentile kings from hundreds of miles away – to be worthy of not only respect due a king, but worship due to God alone: “God in man made manifest.”

Our Lord’s entire life was to be a manifestation of God in the flesh, of the Lord’s ministry of reconciliation in a physical body, a body born of Mary, a body that ate bread and drank wine, a body that would bear scorn, stripes, and a spear, a crucified body gushing water and blood, a body that withheld nothing from His beloved people.

For when the one “born king of the Jews” hung on the cross, He demonstrated not the vengeance of Herod, but the mercy of God: “Father, forgive them. They do not know what they are doing.” Rather than spill the blood of children to save Himself seated on a throne, our Lord spills His own precious blood to save the children of those who sent Him to the cross. Pilate’s sign that read: “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” was the thing Herod feared most – a manifestation, an epiphany, for all the world to see that it is Jesus who is the true and legitimate King, while the Herodians were half-breed pretenders to a puppet throne.

The magi came to adore the eternal King – as do we. We come to this holy place week after week, year after year. Christians have come to “fall down and worship Him” century after century where He is to be found. We bend the knee to the One who was given gold, frankincense, and myrrh, offering Him our lives as humble tokens of submission to His kingship and His divinity.

But this king, unlike wicked Herod, doesn’t come to hold onto power, to govern by terror and intimidation, to collaborate with our enemies. No indeed! Our Lord and King uses His power to make us kings and priests of a new kingdom with Him, governed by love and righteousness. Jesus came to conquer our enemies – and did so on the cross. This King does not tax us for His own comfort, but rather gives Himself as a gift of Himself to comfort us – the bread of His flesh and the wine of His blood.

Like the royal magi who bowed in humility, our Lord Jesus gets on His hands and knees before His disciples to scrub their feet. Rather than exalt Himself on a mighty throne, our Lord descends from the highest throne of all to lie in a manger and hang on a cross, to lie in a tomb, to descend into hell, and to rise again to demonstrate his Lordship over sin, death, and the devil.

The discomfort we Americans have in the face of royalty has to do with the unfairness of it all. Why shouldn’t we enjoy the same benefits as the aristocrats? Our dear Lord agrees. For in taking on our flesh, He has elevated our human flesh to the level of the divine. In His kingly status as the Son of David and the Son of God, He shares his kingship and His kingdom with all of us, declaring us all to be Sons of God through Him. The most unfair thing of all is that we poor miserable sinners do not get what we deserve. For we are no better than the cruel and hypocritical King Herod – and yet, the one “born king of the Jews” unfairly overlooks that, forgives us our sins, intercedes to the Father on our behalf, takes away our reproach and guilt, and manifests Himself as the King of Kings and Lord of Lords who has come to rescue us, so that we may, with St. Paul, “preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and to bring to light for everyone what is the plan of the mystery hidden for ages in God.”

And we, along with the magi, continue to fall down and worship Him and “bring gold and frankincense,” as well as “good news, the praises of the Lord,” now and evermore, world without end. Amen.

In the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Sunday, January 04, 2009

Fr. Hollywood on Lew Rockwell


Sermon: Christmas 2 and Baptism of Madeline Bates


4 January 2009 at Salem Lutheran Church, Gretna, LA

Text: Luke 2:22-40


In the name of + Jesus. Amen.

This is the time of year when new replaces old, and endings become beginnings.

We don’t see the imagery as much as we used to, but the spectacle of the new year is often illustrated symbolically by the juxtaposition of a hunched over old man, representing last year, and a diapered baby, representing the coming year.

And since we Christians (and yes, even the whole world) mark time in relation to our Lord Jesus Christ, there is something profound to the notion that the yielding of the Old Covenant, the Old testament, to be fulfilled by the genesis of the New, would be marked by a baby in swaddling cloths.

Having once more celebrated the birth of God in the flesh, the world has yet again added another year to our universal calendar, 2009 A.D., Anno Domini, which in the Latin of the Empire that governed the holy land during the birth, ministry, death, and resurrection of our Blessed Lord, means “in the year of our Lord.” Jesus Christ is the world’s Lord, the Lamb of God that “takest away the sin of the world.” And what the world calls New Year’s Day, the Christian Church throughout the world celebrates as the Eighth Day of Christmas, the day after the Seven Days of Creation, the first day of a new era. The Eighth Day is the Old Testament’s appointed time, according to the Law of the Old Covenant, to circumcise male children, marking them in their flesh as parties to the Old Covenant. Our Lord Jesus, even as an eight-day old infant, is not merely an ordinary party of the covenant, but the guarantor – for it would be His blood that would be spilled – not only in circumcision, but at the cross – blood shed for you, for the forgiveness of sins.

And our Lord, as the holy firstborn, is declared by the Law of Moses itself to be “holy to the Lord.” And this fulfillment of the Old Covenant ushers in the New Covenant. “The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.”

And with the world, we celebrate another new beginning. But against the grain of the world, we, the Church, join St. Simeon in gazing upon the flesh and blood of Christ Himself and singing: “Lord, now you are letting your servant depart in peace.”

For the Old Covenant finds its fulfillment in Christ, as the Old Passover becomes the eternally New Eucharist, as the eyes of Israel looked forward to the coming Messiah, the eyes of the Church are always fixed on the same Messiah who has come, who comes, and who will come again.

The Old Covenant, and the passing of the baton to the New Covenant, the New Testament, the blood of which flows not only in our chalice but in the veins of our dear Lord, is shown so clearly in the persons of Sts. Simeon and Anna.

Both are elderly children of Israel. Simeon is a prophet bearing a promise, a priestly and holy man who was told he would “not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.” Like his ancestor Abraham, the elderly Simeon clung to the promise, knowing that each passing year brought him closer to the grave, but also knowing that each year brought him closer to the Promise. And at last, while “in the Spirit” in the temple, Simeon held the very Promise, which he calls “salvation”, in his arms. He is now ready to “depart in peace” – not in fear, not in doubt, not in distress, but in “peace.” For our Lord and the baby in his arms is the very Prince of Peace.

After this momentous encounter with Simeon, Mary and Joseph behold yet another personification of the fulfillment of the Old Covenant, in the form of Anna. She too was elderly, a daughter of Israel, a holy prophetess and a godly widow who “did not depart from the temple.” And that temple was being moved – from the magnificent stone edifice of the Old Covenant to the fleshly temple of the New Testament of the infant Lord.

“Behold, I make all things new,” would that little Child, the one more ancient than the world itself, later prophecy Himself – the same One who would tell the world that to enter His kingdom, one must become as a little child.

And as the Church has done on our Lord’s orders since the day of His ascension, we have been receiving men, women, and yes even little children, into the Lord’s kingdom by baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Our dear little sister in Christ, Madeline Bates, has just been received into the Kingdom, made an heir of the Covenant that our Lord fulfilled and of the Testament that our Lord bears in His body and blood, by His Word, and according to His promise.

For Madeline’s eyes too have seen salvation “that [God] has prepared in the presence of all peoples.” Even as members of the body of Christ are born, live, and die – some after long lives like our beloved brother Simeon and sister Anna, some in their infancy – we are all claimed as His own through baptism and made heirs of the Kingdom by His Word and promise.

To Madeline, this date, January 4, 2009, is the greatest day of her life. It is superior even to the date of her physical birth – as great and wonderful as the birth of a child is, especially for mothers and fathers who witness anew the Lord’s creation miracle. This date is greater even than her wedding day will be – even as marriage is a miraculous fusing of two into one flesh – for today, Madeline joined the Church and became a member of the Bride of Christ. And today is even a greater day than the day Madeline will herself enter the glories of heaven – as joyful as that date will be for her (and of course, as we hope and pray that will happen when Madeline has lived a full and long life of promise in God’s Kingdom, like Simeon and Anna). For this day, by water and the Word, Madeline truly entered heaven, dying to the sinful flesh, being crucified with Christ, and rising to newness of life according to the Lord’s promise and pledge.

Dear brothers and sisters, even as we join Simeon’s song of praise of the baby Jesus nearly every Sunday together, as a Church, having just seen the Lord with the eyes of faith (even as our eyes see bread and wine), having just communed with the One who fulfills the ancient Covenant, the One who pledges new and eternal life to us guaranteed by the collateral of His blood – we too can pray with thanks to our Lord any time that we are ready to “depart in peace” according to His Word.

For what is that Word, dear friends? That Word is that you have been forgiven. That Word is that baptismal water bears with it the promise of Christ Himself unto eternal life. That Word is that we, the Church, live in communion with the Christ Child, that we have the privilege to do and see every Sunday what Simeon and Anna waited for decades to do and see, that every Sunday we are able to hear the fulfilled promises that generations of Israelites could only hope and wait for through the passing of centuries and centuries.

The Lord Jesus, born of the Virgin Mary, true God and true Man, brings you good news. He has come to swaddle you in the love of the Father. He has come to lay you in the manger of His grace. He has come to feed you with Manna from heaven. He has come to lead you by water through the perils of a sinful world in the ark of the Church. He has come to keep you in the one true faith year after year, decade after decade, until each one of us is ready to “depart in peace.”

In the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Depression Advice

As we enter a depressed economy, good stewardship calls for Christians and non-Christians alike to be wise with their money and possessions.

Obviously, as the economy has boomed in the past few decades - fueled by never-ending optimism based on borrowing and interest rates held artificially low by the Federal Reserve system, as well as a consumer economy in which marketeers have hypnotically convinced us all to spend money like it's going out of style, it's clear that there are adjustments that we will all have to make.

Fortunately, the overarching idea is quite simple: "spend less money than you make." Sometimes, this is called "living within your means." However, I think the title of this article:10 Smartest Ways to Live Beneath Your Means by Jack Zavada - from the Dumb Little Man: Tips for Life blog (from October 10, 2007) is better terminology.

By living beneath your means, you're doing more than merely breaking even. The idea is not just to avoid debt, but to do even better: savings and investment. It is another way of saying to be thrifty. This is something that most people from my generation and younger have never had to do in our lives.

All of the author's suggestion are simple, common sense strategies that we just need to be reminded of. These are the kinds of things our grandparents and great-grandparents who survived the Great Depression learned from experience. They made it, and we can too. But we need to be wise stewards and cannot simply continue "business as usual" - which for many of us means "if I want it now, I buy it now - even if I have to put it on the credit card."

And if any of you find helpful articles for getting through the coming depression, please post them in comments!

+ Bishop Andrew Elisa + R.I.P.


The passing of 2008 brought another bittersweet passing, the entrance of Bishop Andrew Elisa into glory (31 December 2008).

Bishop Andrew presided over the fledgling Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sudan (ELCS), a conservative, confessional, and traditional Evangelical Catholic church body in communion with the LCMS.

Several of my friends and colleagues knew Bishop Andrew much more intimately than I did. My classmate and friend, the Rev. Kent Schaaf, SSP, spent three weeks with Bp. Elisa teaching seminary classes in Sudan. Bishop Elisa also presided at Mass and preached where Kent serves as pastor, All Saints Lutheran Church in Charlotte, NC. Also, my dear friends, the Rev. Subdeacon Latif Gaba, SSP, and his wife Ruth, had the privilege of hosting the bishop at their apartment in Fort Wayne. All and sundry were impressed with the bishop's quiet demeanor, true humility, and deep piety and devotion to the Lord and to His bride, the Church.

First and foremost, Bishop Andrew Elisa presided over Sudanese Lutherans as a churchman, a loving pastor, a servant of Christ.

I met the bishop once while visiting my old field work congregation, Zion Lutheran Church in Fort Wayne (where I was also ordained) a few years back. Bishop Andrew spoke softly and carried a big crosier (that is to say, the Word of God). He gave a presentation about his fellow Sudanese Christians and all the crosses they bear for the sake of Christ. He did not whine or complain. He simply explained the way things are. He was cheerful even in the midst of telling us of the pain and suffering of his people. This is a pastor who led a persecuted minority of Christians in the midst of Muslim oppression and civil war. He saw fellow Christians martyred, and churches and schools burned to the ground. In the midst of it all, the bishop never lost faith, never became embittered, never sought revenge, and never veered from the Way of the Cross.

What a great example of a blessed churchman and faithful Christian saint we have in Blessed Andrew, now that his life on this side of the grave has been completed.

I look forward to singing the liturgy again with the good bishop around the throne of our Lord for eternity. May we all follow in the footsteps of this faithful churchman as we too tread the cruciform path of our Lord and Master.

Soli Deo gloria!

Friday, January 02, 2009

Coincidentally...


Mrs. H. and I just finished the preface of our latest tandem read, Coincidentally by George W. Rutler. Fr. Rutler is a highly educated Roman Catholic priest in the archdiocese of New York, a writer with a wicked sense of humor - and he is not afraid to use it.

As we've only started the book, I can't yet give it the official Father Hollywood Imprimatur, but if the preface can itself be commended to the FH reader, then consider it done.

This book not only has value because of its content, but it is a treasure in and of itself. It was a gift to me and Mrs. H. from our dear friend, the Rev. Subdeacon Latif Gaba, who served in his subdiaconal role during my holy ordination to the presbyterate. Br. Latif is also a member of the Society of Saint Polycarp (SSP) of which I serve as the current dean, a religious society of Lutheran men, both lay and clergy, bound by a rule of prayer. Br. Latif is also one of my oldest friends from my seminary days, arguably one of the foremost authorities on liturgical matters in the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. His wife, Ruth, is a gifted and brilliant lady who served for many years as librarian at Concordia Theological Seminary - Fort Wayne. We had the pleasure of hosting Latif in the Hollywood Manse a few days during our last SSP retreat, and Lion Boy still laughs at the antics of "Uncle Latif."

The Gabas today live in Milwaukee, and are members of St. Stephen Lutheran Church under the pastoral care of the Rev. Tim May, SSP.

But back to Fr. Rutler's book...

Coincidentally is actually a collection of columns that Fr. Rutler wrote - usually with tongue in cheek - regarding coincidences of history. And regarding such matters, Rutler has an almost Lutheran way of looking at them - that one can tumble off the side of the horse on the side of superstition, that sees connections everywhere to the point of paranoia and fanaticism - but one can also fall off the other side and refuse to see any of the providential hand at work. In support of providence, Fr. Rytler cites an old saying that "coincidences are divine puns" (page x).

Fr. Rutler is, I believe, the first author that I have ever read that used a word that sent me to the Oxford English Dictionary (his use of the word "ambisinistrous" on page xiii initially drove me to a fruitless quest to find the word in the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Tenth Edition). If you like words, you will thoroughly enjoy reading Fr. Rutler. To call him a "wordsmith" would be like making reference to a surgeon as a meat-cutter.

Like all brilliant men, Fr. Rutler not only abhors political correctness, he mocks it. I believe he is spot on when he writes:
"We Americans place such an exaggerated confidence in the power of politics to change things that we tend to interpret most acts politically, and this is the recipe for undisciplined moral zeal. Even philosophers and theologians are characterized as 'conservative' or 'liberal' and speech is either politically correct or incorrect. This was carried to an extreme when an American diplomat at the United nations in the Clinton administration referred to Nelson Mandela as an 'African American South African.' No American in the audience seemed to think the lingusitics odd, presumably because absurdity is not recognized by such as those who take politicized language seriously."
Absurdity is exactly what we are left with when language is made to bow to political power.

I could not help but think of the ridiculousness of a recent Lutheran Witness article about a group of people providing nativity sets to poor churches ("Bringing a Nativity Set to Every Home," Lutheran Witness, December 2008, p. 15). The article at first addresses the absurdity of political correctness by making reference to the "cultural outlook that nativity-set displays in public settings were potentially 'offensive.'" The author notes her appropriate disdain for PC by putting "offensive" in quotes.

But what she gives with one hand, she takes with the other. In the next paragraph, she refers to a nonprofit group that buys nativities for churches "starting their own nativity-set ministries" - using the synodically-correct term "ministry" to describe any act by any religious organization whatsover. But it gets better. The group seeks to "purchase African-American and Hispanic sets."

Oh goodness!

People (even people receiving charity) now want an "African-American" or "Hispanic" Jesus, Mary, and Joseph. Nevermind that there is nothing American (or African, or Hispanic, for that matter) about the real flesh-and-blood Semitic Messiah born in Bethlehem centuries before anyone even knew what America was. Furthermore, at the time of our Lord, Hispania wasn't even yet a Roman province, let alone the ancestor a politically-charged racial word. This kind of PC pandering takes the focus off of our Blessed Lord who came at a specific place and time in human history, of specific heritage, and seeks to claim him for one's own ancestral group - in the same way that one can manipulate the race or ethnicity of a fictional literary charcter. Such an approach to our Blessed Lord - at least as it is deliberately done in our day and age and political culture, a time of racially-charged lingusitics and symbolics - only serves as a form of gnostic idolatry, a making of God "in our image" - which likewise serves the Oprah-god of "self-esteem." And so the author of this article falls right into the lingusitic trap of political correctness even in her use of language, like an innocent lamb wandering into a pit of quicksand.

But at least such absurdities provide us with something to laugh at, some point of realistic reference that reminds us that the world of political correctness is just plain ridiculousness on its face, a nonsensical world of Cheshire Cats and White Rabbits - such as the time when a newspaper reported that a strruggling business was now safely "in the African American."

Anyway, I know I have gone off on a tangent, and that's why this is a blog and not a thesis. If you've read this far, you're obviously a kind and indulgent reader - and when I've finished Coincidentally, I'll provide you with a more complete review - which of course, dear reader, you are free to read or ignore.

But thanks again to Latif for his gift from months ago. Books are like little time bombs that may tick away for months or even years. So far, we're having a "blast."

Thursday, January 01, 2009

Father Hollywood Recommends...

Passionate Housewives Desperate for God

Today was a nice "day off" for the Hollywoods, a lounge-around kind of day that enabled Father and Mrs. H. to do a lot of reading together. We enjoy reading aloud to one another, typically alternating chapters, though time usually doesn't permit us to spend hours in lectio continua, though God's gift of the Kalendae Januariae and a holiday for the Annus Novus provided us opportunity to do so today.

Mrs. H. had previously read Passionate Housewives, and really enjoyed it. She recently started re-reading it, and suggested that I read it as well. So, we went ahead and read it together.

The book is paperback, 206 pages, and was published in 2007. It retails for $16.00, but is currently offered for $10.88 and is highly-rated by reviewers on Amazon. The authors are both Christian wives and mothers.

Jennie Chancey is a mother of eight and editor of the Ladies Against Feminism website and also runs a home-based business called Sense & Sensibility Patterns. She is an outstanding wordsmith, has traveled extensively, and is also the daughter of the first American women to ever fly in a Soviet Mig-29.

Stacy McDonald has apparently "gone metric" as a mother of ten children, and is the wife of Pastor James McDonald of Providence Church (Presbyterian) in Peoria. She has also authored several other books on Christian family life (e.g. Raising Maidens of Virtue), and having family ties to South Louisiana, knows that making pralines from scratch calls for bourbon.

The intended target reader of the book is a Christian woman. Obviously, I only meet one of the two criteria (and I know I'm leaving myself wide open to all of my smart-alec pastor friends here, especially given my admitted fondness for fruity beverages that sport little umbrellas...), but being a parish pastor in the midst of a culture that is heavily influenced, if not completely overtaken, by a feminist, egalitarian, gender-bending worldview, I would include Christian clergymen as good candidates for Passionate Housewives readers. Look, guys, you need to know what is going on in the culture - Christian and secular. This kind of a read is just as important as poring over Kittel's Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. In fact, I believe the book to be a salutary read for all Christian husbands, for I think Christian women and men alike would benefit by examining the countercultural role of the Christian wife. The issue of sex and its God-given roles has, in fact, become the front line of the battle in the Church's current firefight against heresy - as evidenced by worldwide ruptures in Christian communions over women's ordination and the issue of homosexuality. Anyway, I read the book in the role of a polite, quiet, and privileged observer of a dialogue between Mrs. Chancey, Mrs. McDonald, and their sisters in Christ.

Several things impressed me. Both of the authors display an almost encyclopedic knowledge of the Scriptures as encouragement for the Christian life and as exortation to the living-out of the vocation of godly womanhood. The authors apply the Word of God to their own real-world experiences as Christian family women living a lifestyle that is scorned by the world, and sadly, patronized even by many Christian women. The book is not a theology tome, though it clearly has a theological underpinning as a work encouraging Christian women in their vocation as women by virtue of the divine order of creation (over and against the pop-culture's "me-ology" in the words of Mrs. McDonald). Though one might expect such a book to be "preachy" or even legalistic, it is neither. Its tone is sisterly, gentle, encouraging, theologically evangelical and rooted in God's mercy in Christ. It is patient and sympathetic yet without compromise. The prose is candid and conversational without being sloppy or overly colloquial. You will feel like the authors are sitting with you in the parlor sipping a cup of tea and simultaneously tending to their children while carrying on an intelligent discussion about Christian womanhood.

Passionate Housewives is a kind of manual for Christian wives who want to know what biblical womanhood looks like when lived out in the real world. And far from a life of drudgery, Chancey and McDonald present the life of Christian wife and mother to be glorious and joyful. Between the two of them, these ladies have enough children to field two complete baseball teams, so they do have real life experience. Passionate Housewives is far from theoretical and speculative - and the incarnational reality shines through in their references not only to heaven and angels but also to wiping noses and changing diapers.

Here are a couple samples from the book, one from each of the authors:

Mrs. McDonald writes:
"I remember once counseling a young woman who was having difficulty submitting to her husband. When I explained to her that Scripture required her to submit to her husband as unto the Lord, she insisted, with more than a little indignation, that it was impossible to submit to a man who wasn't even trying to meet her needs. It was actually his fault, she explained, that she was forced to sin by not respecting him.

"She went on to describe how her pastor had told her that Scripture didn't require her to even love her husband (ignoring Titus 2:4); only her husband was given that mandate toward her. The neglectful minister also told my friend that she was only required to submit to her husband as long as he 'loved her as Christ loved the church.' To make it even more confusing, she believed that she was the one who was to decide what 'loving her' meant, which in her estimation included (among a long list of other things) how well he fathered her children.

"I asked her pointedly, 'So, are you saying that you believe you are only required to submit to your husband on the days when he 'loves you as Christ loved the Church?'

"'Yes,' she said resolutely. 'When he shows me that kind of love, I will have no problem submitting to him.'

"Her resolve quickly diminished when I pointed out to her that by her logic, her husband also would only be required to love her on those days when she submitted to him as unto the Lord. On the days when he viewed her behavior as unsubmissive, he was free to ignore and neglect her. I explained to her that if they both continued to insist on 'loving for self' rather than 'dying to self,' neither would ever see success in their marriage....

"Thankfully, my friend was more interested in hearing the truth than having her ears tickled. She repented and purposed to submit to her husband regardless of his response or the amount of love and attention he showed her and the children. Her husband eventually came around as he saw the slow and deliberate change in his wife" (pp. 13-14).

Mrs. Chancey writes:
"So, if a housewife isn't that stereotype of 1950s perfection in pearls and heels, than what is she? Down through the centuries, poets and artists have often idealized womanhood and created 'pictures of perfection,' as Jane Austen famously wrote. The nineteenth century gave birth to stacks upon stacks of domestic 'bibles' - books that detailed the duties of virtuous housekeeping and child training. While there is much to applaud in these poetic and practical paeans to femininity and domesticity, we are not attempting to resurrect old-fashioned ideals for the sake of 'the good old days.' What we really desire to do in this book is to present a full-orbed picture of biblical womanhood in all its beauty and complexity - and demonstrate why that picture is realistic and timeless rather than impractical and culture-bound.

"Rest assured that biblical homemaking isn't about shiny appliances or weed-free flowerbeds (though these certainly might be some tools of the trade). It isn't about perfect children in neatly-stitched clothes. It isn't about mealy-mouthed 'yes-women' who never offer an opinion or share an original thought. Far from it! Biblical womanhood is challenging, intelligent, adventurous, kingdom-building, whole-hearted hard work. It encompasses all kinds of gifts and talents and provides us with an outlet for genuinely purposeful creativity and effort - all within the realm of the fully functioning Christian home" (pp. 159-160).
I suspect that Passionate Housewives is the kind of book that will both anger and inspire Christian women - by challenging the dominant worldview that eschews wifely submission, and by encouraging Christian women to be a helpmeet to their husbands and to serve the Lord by the holy vocation He has given them - an honorable and crucial station for the continuance of God's Kingdom. I also suspect that it will be to many Christian women what The Hammer of God is to a lot of Lutheran pastors, a beloved companion to be read, re-read, dog-eared, and marked up as a practical affirmation of our priestly vocations in service of the Kingdom - vocations often hated by the world and sadly scorned even within the Church, but vocations nonetheless established by the Lord Himself for the salvation of mankind.

Well done, ladies! Thank you for your work and insights and for your faithful devotion to your holy callings, and blessings to you and your families in this new year.